From the Liturgy of the Catechumens to the Liturgy of the Faithful
In this commentary series on the Divine Liturgy I
would like examine the original transition from the so-called “Liturgy of the
Catechumens” (i.e. the first part of the service to which catechumens were
welcomed) to the so-called “Liturgy of the Faithful” (i.e. the second part of
the service from which catechumens were excluded and to which only the
communicant faithful were welcomed). As we saw in my previous commentary on the
Liturgy, the Byzantine liturgical developments have displaced this transition
somewhat: originally the catechumens were prayed for and sent out immediately
after they were prayed for after the Gospel reading and the sermon. The
original intercessions of the Church for the world were only offered after the
catechumens had departed. The insertion of the Litany of Fervent Supplication
before the Litany of the Catechumens (our present arrangement) disturbs this
original arrangement, dislodging the original transition. The original
beginning of the Liturgy of the Faithful came not after the sermon, but after
the dismissal of the catechumens. It began with the prayers of intercession for
the world (what we now call “the Great Litany”) and made a final visual
transition as the clergy approached the altar.
We must try to imagine what the Liturgy looked like
during the time of Chrysostom and of Maximus the Confessor a couple of
centuries later. In that time while the catechumens were being prayed for and dismissed,
and then as the prayers of intercession were offered, the deacons exited the
church through the north door to enter the little building adjacent to it where
the holy vessels were kept. There they gathered up the bread and wine, the
chalices, cloths, spoons, spears, and everything needed for the Eucharist and
came back with them to the altar, where the episcopal celebrant was waiting for
them. While they were gong, the bishop and his presbyters were preparing
themselves for the Eucharist: they washed their hands and moved to take their
places around the altar. Today the priestly celebrant stands at the altar for
the entire service, but originally their place during the readings was sitting
on their seats in the far east end of the apse, on the synthronon. Thus the
transition from the service centered on the Gospel to the service centered on
the Eucharist had a distinctly visual component, for one could observe the
clergy leave their seats where they had sat throughout the readings to gather
around the altar table.
The prayers accompanying this transition express what
they are doing, and may be aptly described as prayers of access to the altar.
Today these prayers are mistitled “The Prayers of the Faithful”, since they
come at the place where the Prayers of the Faithful for the world—i.e. the
Great Litany—once stood. But they are clearly not the prayers of the people,
but the private devotional prayers of the clergy. Even a quick look at the
prayers themselves reveals this: the clergy pray that God who “have accounted
us worthy to stand even now before Your holy altar” may “enable us whom You
have placed in this Your service, blamelessly and without offence to call upon
You at all times and in every place”. The second prayer asks that God would
“grant us to stand blameless and without condemnation before Your holy altar”
and would “grant also to those who pray with us [i.e. the laity] growth in life
and faith and spiritual understanding”. The silent prayer which the celebrant
offers while the Cherubic Hymn is being sung says the same: “Enable me who am
endowed with the grace of the priesthood to stand before this, Your holy Table,
and perform the sacred mystery of Your holy and pure Body and precious Blood”.
Yet another prayer, offered after the Great Entrance has taken place, is
another prayer of access to the altar: “Accept also the prayer of us sinners,
and bring us to Your holy altar, enabling us to offer unto You gifts and
spiritual sacrifices for our sins and for the errors of the people”.
Why such a plethora of prayer all begging the same
thing? Because it is a great and fearful thing for mortal man to stand before
the consuming Fire of the holy God. We tend to imagine that a church service is
simply a matter of us on earth sending our prayers “upstairs”, and launching
our supplications to heaven. It is much scarier than that: it is a matter of
inviting the Lord of all, before whom even the glorious cherubim and the fiery
seraphim veil their faces in awe, to come “downstairs” and to dwell in our midst.
“Who among us can dwell with the devouring fire?” asked the sinners of Zion
with trembling (Isaiah 33:14). Who indeed? Yet we sinners in the Eucharist
invite the devouring Fire into our midst, inviting a collision of sinful man
with the holy God. In this collision (with the clergy in the front seats—hence
all those prayers of access to the altar), we take a tremendous risk. Some
found this to their cost, as St. Paul reminded his Corinthian converts who
received unworthily (1 Corinthians 11:30). But if we all approach in penitence,
in humility, forgiving others with contrite hearts and asking for our own
forgiveness, this collision does not destroy us, but heal us. We are not
consumed by the devouring fire, but illumined, warmed, transformed. These prayers
of access to the altar reveal that the Eucharist to which we now transition is
a daring epiclesis, invoking the fire of God upon us and inviting into our
midst both judgment and salvation.
This Eucharist is not only a collision, but also a
coalescing, as heaven joins with earth. In the days of Chrysostom and Maximus,
the gifts of bread and wine were brought into the church to the accompaniment
of a psalm—almost certainly Psalm 24:7-10. It was an obvious choice, since the
psalm speaks not only of the Lord of glory coming in (i.e. Christ coming to us
in the Eucharist through the Chalice), but also of doors and gates. What better
psalm could serve for the procession as it re-entered the nave through the
doors and gates leading to and from the sacristy outside? And the refrain of
the psalm expressed the nature of the Eucharist which followed—originally the
refrain was simply a triple “Alleluia”, but later was added to it the words
“Let us who mystically represent the cherubim and who sing the thrice-holy hymn
to the life-creating Trinity now lay aside all earthly cares that we may
receive the King of all who comes invisibly upborne by the angelic hosts”. The
refrain was sung over and over between the verses of the psalm until the
procession reached the altar and placed the gifts upon the table. (Eventually
the psalm dropped out, leaving the refrain all by itself, which was later split
in half in mid-sentence to allow for intercessions during the procession.)
But however it is now sung, the words of the refrain reveal
the true nature of the Eucharist as a joining of heaven and earth, an
intersection of time and eternity. It is not simply a matter of us on earth
singing like the cherubim while the cherubim themselves sing in heaven. No:
Christ comes upborne by those angelic hosts, and we represent the cherubim by
giving audible earthly expression to their spiritual songs as they accompany
Christ as He comes to us in the Eucharist. Heaven joins with earth, and earth
is lifted up to heaven. That is what the celebrant means when he says to the
people to “Lift up your hearts!”—he is not exhorting them to cheer up, but to
ascend to heaven. It is easier than it sounds, for in the Eucharist heaven
comes down to us on earth. We serve and receive the Eucharist with the angels
of heaven, with the saints, and with all the faithful who have gone before. Our
Christian dead may indeed be described as “the dearly departed”, but in the
Eucharist we find that they have not departed very far. They are with Christ,
and so with us as well.
All this is revealed in this original transition to
the Liturgy of the Faithful. That Liturgy is a collision and a coalescing, and
it brings the potential for both judgment and salvation into our very midst.
By Fr.
Lawrence Farley
Source: https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/nootherfoundation/commentary-divine-liturgy-transitioning-eucharist/
